Footpath name or location ____________ (see ‘About Hitchin’ map)
Estimated length _____ (see list)
Scores 1 = poor, 3 = acceptable, 5 = excellent, NA = not applicable
| Criterion and examples | Score | Comment | ||
| Is the path made easy to use and is it worth using? | ||||
| Signage (legible, accurate and useful statement of destination, distance, any hazards, not vandalized?) |
|
|||
| Connectivity (is the path useful in connecting locations, providing a shortcut or alternative to a road journey? Does it avoid dangerous roads?) |
|
|||
| Attractiveness (are there points of interest, pleasant surroundings, wildlife opportunities, freedom from noise – e.g. of factories) |
|
|||
| Health, safety and security | ||||
| Surface (evenness, potholes, evidence of recent maintenance, dry and not muddy, where paving slabs, are they secure and even?) |
|
|||
| Boundaries (are they in good repair, clear of graffiti or other vandalism, overgrown where hedges, is the path free of over-hanging branches?) |
|
|||
| Wheelchair access (wide enough, suitable surface and gradient, steps?) This may be NA for rural paths.
|
|
|||
| Barriers to prevent children running onto busy roads at ends? | Y/N |
|
||
| Barriers to prevent access by motor vehicles? (are they broken or have they been removed / damaged?) | Y/N |
|
||
| Cycling – do cyclists routinely ride, do they pose a danger? |
|
|||
| Lighting (distance between, does it work? NA for rural paths) |
|
|||
| Visibility (is there passive surveillance, are there bends or corners which would raise perceived crime threat?) |
|
|||
| Litter and vandalism | ||||
| Is there evidence of vandalism, litter and / or fly-tipping (both on path and in visible surroundings) Is litter ‘offensive’ – e.g. syringes / condoms? |
|
|||
| Litter bins – are there any and have they been emptied? | Y/N |
|
||
| Dog fouling – recent? | Y/N |
|
||
| Dog excrement bins – are there any? | Y/N |
|
||
| Conclusions
|
||||
| Recommended action
|
||||